United States — consumer credit
Top drivers
⌁ mcp.call("adw-015") vADW-015-live-1.0 How stressed is US consumer credit right now — rising delinquencies or credit binging?
United States — consumer credit
Top drivers
⌁ mcp.call("adw-015") vADW-015-live-1.0 A credit-monitoring agent polls ADW-015 each month and fires when the score crosses 58 (above its historical mean of 48.8) on a rising trend with confidence > 0.8. The IOM's top_drivers field tells the agent which component is leading — delinquency rate (DRCCLACBS) or revolving credit growth (REVOLSL) — so it can route the alert to the correct downstream workflow: a delinquency spike triggers tightened underwriting rules, while a revolving-credit surge triggers a 'credit binging' flag for collections pre-staging. The source_lineage pointing to FRED and a versioned methodology (z_delinq 0.6 + z_revolving_yoy 0.4, 36-month window) means the action is fully auditable against regulatory exam questions. At the current reading of 54.8 — the 79th percentile in 10 years of history — the agent would already be in an elevated-watch state despite the falling trend, warranting continued surveillance rather than full alert dismissal.
A consumer-bank Chief Risk Officer uses ADW-015 as a monthly forward-indicator layer on top of internal delinquency reports, which lag by 30-60 days due to reporting cycles. When the composite z-score climbs into the upper quartile (as it sits now at the 79th percentile), the CRO convenes the credit committee to review line-of-credit exposure and tighten approval cutoffs for new revolving accounts — a decision that previously required assembling delinquency, charge-off, and revolving-balance data from three separate systems manually. The packaged IOM replaces two hours of monthly data assembly with a single API call whose top_drivers field directs attention to whichever signal is driving stress.
z_delinq (0.6) + z_revolving_yoy (0.4); both z-scored vs trailing 36-period window → composite z → 0-100 (50=neutral, >50=stress rising)
Version ADW-015-live-1.0 · validated to beat a naive baseline · benchmark: none packaged
One call returns the answer with its reasoning attached — the live Intelligence Object for ADW-015.
{
"product_id": "ADW-015",
"entity": "United States — consumer credit",
"score": 54.8,
"trend": "stable",
"confidence": 0.85,
"top_drivers": [
{
"factor": "delinquency_rate_z",
"contribution": 0.505
},
{
"factor": "revolving_growth_yoy_z",
"contribution": -0.03
}
],
"recommended_use": "Monitor consumer credit stress. High score = rising delinquencies / credit binging; flag default-risk escalation. Descriptive, quarterly lag for delinquency data.",
"methodology_version": "ADW-015-live-1.0",
"freshness": "2026-06-27T05:00:16.863Z",
"coverage": "US national (FRED DRCCLACBS + REVOLSL)",
"source_lineage": [
"FRED DRCCLACBS (Credit Card Delinquency Rate)",
"FRED REVOLSL (Revolving Consumer Credit)"
],
"allowed_use": "informational",
"credit_stress_score": 54.8,
"stress_level": "elevated",
"delinquency_rate_pct": 2.92,
"delinquency_rate_z": 0.841,
"revolving_credit_yoy_pct": 3.81,
"revolving_credit_z": -0.074,
"composite_z": 0.475,
"validation_status": "descriptive"
} Every product conforms to the Intelligence Object Model — typed, versioned, and discoverable.
Dashboard
Read the score + drivers in the console.
REST API
/v1/intelligence/adw-015
MCP tool
adw.adw_015
Marketplace
Discoverable by any MCP agent via the MCP registry.
White-label
Embed under your own brand (Platinum).
Enables retailers and brands to time promotions and optimize assortment by quantifying the financial pressure on consumers' discretionary spending.
Method: YoY Core CPI vs YoY Avg Hourly Earnings divergence; z-score vs 36mo trailing window → 0-100 (50=neutral, >50=squeeze rising)
Enables brands to distinguish whether their pricing power stems from emotional aspiration or functional utility to identify and mitigate pricing fragility.
Method: Apparel CPI YoY minus Core CPI YoY spread; z-scored vs 5yr history; mapped 0-100 (50=parity, >50=aspiration premium rising)
Quantifies divergence between actual gasoline price moves and consumer sentiment to flag political risk and demand-destruction scenarios.
Method: MoM gas CPI % vs MoM UMich sentiment (scaled); |divergence| z-scored vs 36mo history; score 100=aligned, 0=extreme gap