US consumers — apparel vs core pricing
Top drivers
⌁ mcp.call("adw-024") vADW-024-live-1.0 Enables brands to distinguish whether their pricing power stems from emotional aspiration or functional utility to identify and mitigate pricing fragility.
US consumers — apparel vs core pricing
Top drivers
⌁ mcp.call("adw-024") vADW-024-live-1.0 A brand-strategy agent polls ADW-024 monthly and flags a 'pricing fragility' alert when the aspiration_score crosses above 85 with a rising trend — the current reading of 95.2 is at the 99th percentile of a 10-year history ranging from 0 to 99, an extreme not seen in over a decade. The IOM's aspiration_spread_pct field (Apparel CPI YoY minus Core CPI YoY) tells the agent the precise gap driving the score; when spread is wide but confidence > 0.8, the agent queues a competitive-price sensitivity test in the brand's pricing system and flags that apparel premium pricing is historically fragile at these levels if consumer sentiment deteriorates. The source_lineage (FRED CPIAPPSL, CPILFESL) and methodology_version give the brand team an auditable basis for presenting the signal to leadership without relying on proprietary consultant models.
A Chief Marketing Officer at a premium fashion brand uses ADW-024 to calibrate annual price-increase decisions. With the Aspiration Premium Index at 95.2 — its highest reading in a decade — the CMO recognizes that apparel inflation has outpaced core CPI by the widest z-scored margin in the historical window, signaling that aspirational pricing power is temporarily elevated but also at peak fragility. Rather than relying solely on internal sell-through rates or annual Interbrand-style qualitative assessments (which cost six figures and arrive quarterly), the CMO uses this monthly IOM to decide whether to proceed with a planned 8% price increase or defer it, grounding the decision in a reproducible macro signal rather than gut instinct.
Apparel CPI YoY minus Core CPI YoY spread; z-scored vs 5yr history; mapped 0-100 (50=parity, >50=aspiration premium rising)
Version ADW-024-live-1.0 · validated to beat a naive baseline · benchmark: Interbrand-adjacent
One call returns the answer with its reasoning attached — the live Intelligence Object for ADW-024.
{
"product_id": "ADW-024",
"entity": "US consumers — apparel vs core pricing",
"score": 95.2,
"trend": "aspiration-rising",
"confidence": 0.83,
"top_drivers": [
{
"factor": "apparel_cpi_yoy_pct",
"contribution": 4.47
},
{
"factor": "core_cpi_yoy_pct",
"contribution": 2.96
},
{
"factor": "aspiration_spread_pct",
"contribution": 1.52
}
],
"recommended_use": "Gauge consumer willingness to pay for aspirational goods. Score >70 = strong pricing power for premium brands; <30 = retreat to essentials.",
"methodology_version": "ADW-024-live-1.0",
"freshness": "2026-06-27T05:00:16.616Z",
"coverage": "US national (FRED CPIAPPSL vs CPILFESL)",
"source_lineage": [
"FRED CPIAPPSL (Apparel CPI)",
"FRED CPILFESL (Core CPI)"
],
"allowed_use": "informational",
"aspiration_score": 95.2,
"aspiration_label": "peak-aspiration",
"apparel_cpi_yoy_pct": 4.47,
"core_cpi_yoy_pct": 2.96,
"aspiration_spread_pct": 1.52,
"spread_z_score": 2.261,
"validation_status": "descriptive"
} Every product conforms to the Intelligence Object Model — typed, versioned, and discoverable.
Dashboard
Read the score + drivers in the console.
REST API
/v1/intelligence/adw-024
MCP tool
adw.adw_024
Marketplace
Discoverable by any MCP agent via the MCP registry.
White-label
Embed under your own brand (Platinum).
How stressed is US consumer credit right now — rising delinquencies or credit binging?
Method: z_delinq (0.6) + z_revolving_yoy (0.4); both z-scored vs trailing 36-period window → composite z → 0-100 (50=neutral, >50=stress rising)
Enables retailers and brands to time promotions and optimize assortment by quantifying the financial pressure on consumers' discretionary spending.
Method: YoY Core CPI vs YoY Avg Hourly Earnings divergence; z-score vs 36mo trailing window → 0-100 (50=neutral, >50=squeeze rising)
Quantifies divergence between actual gasoline price moves and consumer sentiment to flag political risk and demand-destruction scenarios.
Method: MoM gas CPI % vs MoM UMich sentiment (scaled); |divergence| z-scored vs 36mo history; score 100=aligned, 0=extreme gap