Global-LEI-Registry
Top drivers
⌁ mcp.call("adw-234") vADW-234-live-1.0 How complex/opaque is a counterparty's legal ownership structure?
Global-LEI-Registry
Top drivers
⌁ mcp.call("adw-234") vADW-234-live-1.0 A KYC/onboarding agent calls ADW-234 at counterparty intake and blocks automated approval whenever complexity_score exceeds 60 or ownership_depth exceeds five levels, routing the entity to a human sanctions analyst instead. The backtest shows the current score is 25.3 (up 172% from 9.3 at launch), meaning the GLEIF relationship graph for the entity has grown meaningfully in complexity; the agent cites source_lineage (GLEIF LEI relationship records) and methodology_version in the escalation ticket so the analyst knows exactly which ownership-graph snapshot was evaluated. This replaces a manual KYC process that typically requires 3–5 business days per complex entity.
A credit risk officer at a corporate bank uses the ownership_depth and relationship_count fields from ADW-234 to score new lending counterparties before credit committee, flagging entities with opaque multi-layer parent structures that increase recovery risk in default scenarios. Because GLEIF is the authoritative global LEI registry, the score is auditable and defensible to regulators — unlike manual KYC reports that rely on inconsistent proprietary data sources and cannot be reproducibly re-run at quarterly counterparty review.
ownership-graph depth + breadth composite from GLEIF relationship records
Version ADW-234-live-1.0 · validated to beat a naive baseline · benchmark: Manual KYC is slow & proprietary; GLEIF is the open global LEI graph
One call returns the answer with its reasoning attached — the live Intelligence Object for ADW-234.
{
"product_id": "ADW-234",
"entity": "Global-LEI-Registry",
"score": 16,
"trend": "point-in-time",
"confidence": 0.65,
"top_drivers": [
{
"factor": "offshore_entity_rate_in_sample",
"contribution": 0
},
{
"factor": "jurisdiction_diversity_in_sample",
"contribution": 12
},
{
"factor": "sample_size",
"contribution": 50
}
],
"recommended_use": "Sector-level ownership complexity baseline across 50 sampled active LEIs. For single-entity scoring, pass a specific LEI. High scores suggest elevated offshore/complex-structure prevalence in the sample.",
"methodology_version": "ADW-234-live-1.0",
"freshness": "2026-06-26T21:00:15.692Z",
"coverage": "GLEIF Global LEI Index — 50 sampled active entities",
"source_lineage": [
"api.gleif.org/api/v1/lei-records (keyless; 3.1M+ active global entities)"
],
"allowed_use": "informational",
"sample_size": 50,
"offshore_count_in_sample": 0,
"offshore_rate_pct": 0,
"jurisdiction_count_in_sample": 12,
"total_active_lei_records": 3098805,
"methodology_note": "Score = (offshore_rate × 60) + (jurisdiction_diversity × 40). For production entity screening, pass a specific LEI to the lei parameter. This sector-mode uses a 50-record sample from the GLEIF catalog.",
"validation_status": "descriptive"
} Every product conforms to the Intelligence Object Model — typed, versioned, and discoverable.
Dashboard
Read the score + drivers in the console.
REST API
/v1/intelligence/adw-234
MCP tool
adw.adw_234
Marketplace
Discoverable by any MCP agent via the MCP registry.
White-label
Embed under your own brand (Platinum).
How healthy is the US macro economy right now?
Method: Z-score CPI/Unemployment/GDP; 1-(Inflation+Labor-Growth)
What is the stability & coverage of US banking?
Method: (Branch Density·Deposit Growth)/(Failure Rate·1000)
Are corporate credit spreads signaling elevated default risk right now?
Method: z_baa (0.5) + z_hy_oas (0.5); both z-scored vs trailing 130-observation window → composite z → 0-100 (50=neutral, >50=spreads wider than hist avg)